In a significant move towards fostering transparency and accountability in environmental advertising, the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) has unveiled a comprehensive set of draft guidelines on “Environmental/Green Claims.” The aim is to combat greenwashing and ensure that advertisements present truthful and evidence-based environmental claims.
Understanding Environmental Claims
Environmental claims encompass statements that imply a product or service has a positive impact on the environment. This includes claims of being environmentally friendly, sustainable, or having specific environmental benefits. These claims can be explicit or implicit, appearing in various forms such as advertisements, marketing materials, branding, packaging, or other consumer information.
The Menace of Greenwashing
ASCI is taking a strong stance against greenwashing – the deceptive practice of making misleading environmental claims. The organization emphasizes the need for substantiated, comparable, and verifiable claims to counteract the spread of misinformation. Through ad surveillance, ASCI has identified the loose use of terms conveying environmental benefits, giving a false impression of a product’s green credentials.
Also Read: ASCI’s New Guidelines for Health and Financial Influencers
Proposed Guidelines
The draft guidelines put forth by ASCI outline clear standards for environmental claims in advertising. Some key points include:
- Absolute claims such as but not limited to “environment friendly”, “eco-friendly”, “sustainable”, “planet friendly” that imply that the product advertised has no impact or only a positive impact must be supported by a high level of substantiation. Comparative claims such as “greener” or “friendlier” can be justified, for example, if the advertised product or service provides a total environmental benefit over that of the advertiser’s previous product or service or competitor products or services and the basis of such comparison is made clear.
- Environmental claims must be based on the full life cycle of the advertised product or service, unless the advertisement states otherwise, and must make clear the limits of the life cycle. If a general claim cannot be justified, a more limited claim about specific aspects of a product or service might be justifiable. Claims that are based on only part of an advertised product or service’s life cycle must not mislead consumers about the product or service’s total environmental impact.
- Unless it is clear from the context, an environmental claim should specify whether it refers to the product, the product’s packaging, a service, or just to a portion of the product, package, or service.
- Advertisements must not mislead consumers about the environmental benefit that a product or service offers by highlighting the absence of an environmentally damaging ingredient if that ingredient is not usually found in competing products or services by highlighting an environmental benefit that results from a legal obligation if competing products are subject to the same requirements.
- Certifications and Seals of Approval should make clear which attributes of the product or service have been evaluated by the certifier, and the basis of such certification provided. Certifications and Seals used in an advertisement should be from a Nationally/Internationally recognised certifying authority.
- Visual elements in an ad should not give a false impression about the product/service being advertised. For example, logos representing a recycling process on packaging and/or in advertising material can significantly influence a consumer’s impression of the environmental impact of a product or service.
- Advertisers should refrain from making aspirational claims about future environmental objectives unless they have developed clear and actionable plans detailing how those objectives will be achieved.
- For carbon offset claims advertisers should clearly and prominently disclose if the carbon offset represents emission reductions that will not occur for two years or longer. Ads should not claim directly or by implication that a carbon offset represents an emission reduction if the reduction, or the activity that caused the reduction, was required by law.
- For claims pertaining to the product being compostable, biodegradable, recyclable, non-toxic, free-of etc. advertisers should qualify the aspects to which such claims are being attributed, and the extent of the same. All such claims should have competent and reliable scientific evidence to show that:
- The product or the qualified component where applicable will break down within a reasonably short period of time after customary disposal.
- The product is free of elements that can lead to environmental hazards.
Manisha Kapoor’s perspective
Manisha Kapoor, CEO and Secretary-General, ASCI said, “ASCI’s draft guidelines on Environmental/Green Claims are a crucial step to ensure that consumers who wish to support green brands have the correct information to make an informed decision. These guidelines set a standard for advertisers, and aim to foster a culture of transparency and authenticity in advertising in the best interest of the consumers. We encourage all stakeholders, including consumers, industry, civil society members, and experts, to provide their feedback on the draft guidelines to enable us to sharpen and strengthen them.”
Also Read: ART-E launches ‘Aayega Teesra’ Anthem, Paving the Path to Team India’s 3rd World Cup
ASCI: Guidelines on Environmental Advertising
In conclusion, ASCI’s draft guidelines mark a crucial step towards establishing a standard for advertisers, promoting transparency, and fostering authenticity in environmental advertising for the benefit of consumers and the planet. Stakeholders are urged to participate in the feedback process to contribute to the enhancement of these guidelines.
